User: Stevegiacomelli

From open-encyclopedia.com - the free encyclopedia.

What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia apparently its not a source of reliable scholarly information but rather a consortium of nerds with no central planning authority.

This project is poorly planed, poorly cordinated and poorly executed.

The idea holds merit but currently this is horribly executed.

There is a danger with Wikipedia, the danger is that it will replace other more reliable sources of information and cause the difusion of mis-information resulting in the dumbing down of civilization.

There is no coordination between different language versions, no coordinated effort to categorize things properly and pages generally exist outside of context.

The documents are not stored in any real structual form, and this limits the usefulness of them.

Don't bother responding to me or this since i am inactive forever.